Monday, October 31, 2011

Hearings for the 112th Congress House Judiciary Commitee Partial List For November 2011





Hearing Information
Oversight Hearing on: The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs
Wednesday 11/2/2011 - 10:00 a.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
By Direction of the Chairman

Witness List
The Honorable Laurie Robinson
Assistant Attorney General
Office of Justice Programs


Hearing on: H.R. 2121, the "China Democracy Promotion Act of 2011"
Wednesday 11/2/2011 - 1:30 p.m. 3:30p.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement
By Direction of the Chairman


Mark Up Information

Meeting to: Consider authorizing the Chairman to issue a subpoena to the Department of Homeland Security

Wednesday, November 2, 2011 1:00 p.m. 2141 Rayburn House Office Building


Full Committee Markup ofH.R. 1254, the “Synthetic Drug Control Act of 2011”;
H.R. 3010, the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011”;
H.R. 546, the “Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act”; and,
H.R. 2369, To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for an additional power for the American Legion under its Federal charter.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011 1:00 p.m. 2141 Rayburn House Office Building and
Full Committee Markup ofH.R. 1254, the “Synthetic Drug Control Act of 2011”;
H.R. 3010, the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011”;
H.R. 546, the “Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act”; and,
H.R. 2369, To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for an additional power for the American Legion under its Federal charter.
Thursday, November 3, 2011 10:00 a.m. 2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Markup Documentation
 
Introduced Bill # Title Report
3/30/2011 H.R. 1254 the "Synthetic Drug Control Act of 2011"
Amendment in the nature of a substitute
 
9/22/2011 H.R. 3010 the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011”
 
2/8/2011 H.R. 546 the “Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act”
Amendment in the nature of a substitute
 
6/24/2011 H.R. 2369 To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for an additional power for the American Legion under its Federal charter.

Full Committee Markup ofH.R. 1254, the “Synthetic Drug Control Act of 2011”;
H.R. 3010, the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011”;
H.R. 546, the “Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act”; and,
H.R. 2369, To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for an additional power for the American Legion under its Federal charter.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011 1:00 p.m. 2141 Rayburn House Office Building and
Full Committee Markup ofH.R. 1254, the “Synthetic Drug Control Act of 2011”;
H.R. 3010, the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011”;
H.R. 546, the “Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act”; and,
H.R. 2369, To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for an additional power for the American Legion under its Federal charter.
Thursday, November 3, 2011 10:00 a.m. 2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Markup Documentation
 
Introduced Bill # Title Report
3/30/2011 H.R. 1254 the "Synthetic Drug Control Act of 2011"
Amendment in the nature of a substitute
 
9/22/2011 H.R. 3010 the “Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011”
 
2/8/2011 H.R. 546 the “Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act”
Amendment in the nature of a substitute
 
6/24/2011 H.R. 2369 To amend title 36, United States Code, to provide for an additional power for the American Legion under its Federal charter.  
   

Hearing on: "21st Century Law Enforcement: How Smart Policing Targets Criminal Behavior"
Friday 11/4/2011 - 10:00 a.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
By Direction of the Chairman

DOJ official knew of ATF "gunwalking" in April 2010

By Sharyl Attkisson






WASHINGTON - There is new information about how much the Department of Justice new about the controversial ATF tactic of letting guns "walk" into the hands of criminals.

Gunwalking is a controversial investigative tactic in which police allow suspects to traffic guns without stopping them in order to see where they end up. Documents just released this afternoon show the head of the Justice Department's criminal division, Lanny A. Breuer, learned about the tactic of ATF gunwalking as early as April of last year.

In a memo, Breuer's deputy wrote him that, in a case called "Wide Receiver" started under the Bush Administration, "ATF let a bunch of guns walk" in an effort to catch the big fish of Mexican drug cartels and said the gunwalking case could be "embarrassing" to ATF.

Today, Breuer issued a statement saying he "regrets" that he didn't alert others in Justice Department leadership, apparently including his boss Attorney General Eric Holder.

In a separate ATF case reported by CBS News earlier this year, called "Fast and Furious" and started under the Obama Administration, Breuer says he likewise regrets not alerting leaders about the similarities in the cases. That, said Breuer, was a mistake.

Republican Congressional investigators say this new information contradicts the Justice Department's original letter to them earlier this year insisting that gunwalking allegations were "false."

CBS NEWS

Cleanup ATF.org Calls On Congress To Appoint A Specials Prosecutor On Fast N Furious

Fast N Furious Investigation Exclusive.


Whereas overwhelming evidence establishes that substantial acts of wrongdoing may have been committed by senior Officials of the United States Government, including persons such as Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., Ronald H. Weich, Dennis Burke, and others acting for or on behalf of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Kenneth E. Melson, William J. Hoover, Mark Chait, William G. McMahon, William D. Newell, George Gillett Jr., and others of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), and possibly other officials within the Obama Administration, CleanUpATF.org hereby respectfully requests that Congress should enact and empower, on behalf of the American people and pursuant to 28 C.F.R. PART 600, one or more Special Prosecutors, who shall be timely responsible for:

  • Fully investigating the facts and circumstances surrounding "Operation Fast & Furious", "Project Gunrunner", "Operation Castaway", and any other related federal law enforcement activities as Congress should deem appropriate, and;
  •  
  • Determining whether any federal, state and/or international regulations, laws, statutes, treaties, agreements or other binding conventions were violated, and;

  • Determining which officials and/or employees, whether elected or appointed, of the U.S. Government, had substantial knowledge of, or should have had knowledge of, the activities resulting in any such violations, and;
  •  
  • Determining which officials and/or employees, whether elected or appointed, of the U.S. Government, were materially responsible for planning, approving and/or otherwise enacting any operations or activities leading to such violations, and;
  •  
  • Determining whether any such officials and/or employees of the U.S. Government may have engaged in improper activities aimed at "covering-up", obstructing, frustrating, obfuscating, minimizing or preventing efforts by Members of Congress to conduct lawful oversight inquiries, and/or designed to evade rightful accountability for wrongful acts by such officials or employees;
  •  
  • Insuring that any officials and/or employees of the U.S. Government who committed substantial acts of wrongdoing are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.
  •  
  • Issuing a comprehensive Report of Investigation and Recommendations to the Congress and American people.



NRA Says Fire Eric Holder


NRA-ILA
NRA - ILA
Charlotte, NC --(Ammoland.com)- Crimes were committed in the name of advancing an anti-gun agenda.

The longer these crimes go unanswered… the longer Attorney General Eric Holder stonewalls Congress… the greater the threat to our freedom.

Please watch the video I’ve attached for you. Holder’s actions prove he can’t be trusted with the sanctity of our freedoms, the powers of his office, or the lives of our law enforcement officers.

Help me send a message to President Obama. It’s time to fire Eric Holder. Please make a donation to help us broadcast this video across America. And please, help spread the word and forward this video to friends and fellow gun owners.

Thank you.
Sincerely,
Chris W. Cox
Executive Director
 
 
About:
Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America’s oldest civil rights and sportsmen’s group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation’s leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the military. Visit: www.nra.org


‘Fast and Furious’: How botched operation spawned fatal results

Overseer promised skeptical agents ‘most fun’ with ATF

 

 

The central characters in the failed “Fast and Furious” firearms investigation were 19 men and one woman, all legal residents of the U.S., accused of laying down hundreds of thousands of dollars in illicit cash at Phoenix-area gun shops to buy an arsenal of high-powered weapons for Mexican drug smugglers.

Between September 2009 and December 2010, congressional investigators said, they purchased or aided in the purchase of more than 2,000 AK-47 assault weapons, Barrett .50-caliber sniper rifles, FN 5.7mm semi-automatic pistols and other assorted rifles, shotguns and handguns that later were “walked” into Mexico. About half the weapons remain unaccounted for.

They paid cash, as much as $900,000, and with each purchase they signed their names on Form 4473, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) document, swearing under the threat of committing a felony that they were not purchasing the weapons for someone else — that they were not “straw buyers.”

But they were, and the ATF knew it.

Most of the purchases were recorded on video equipment mounted by ATF agents in the shops of cooperating gun dealers; other buys were personally witnessed by undercover agents in the stores. Some ATF officials at the agency’s Washington, D.C., headquarters could watch live video feeds of the weapons being purchased.

The plan
It was part of a plan, a risky strategy to allow weapons to be placed in what agents call the “Iron River” of guns flowing south into Mexico. The goal, of course, was to feed the gun-trafficking network and to identify the big fish, the drug cartel bosses in Mexico who were paying for the weapons.

There was to be no interdiction of the purchased guns before they crossed the border, as frustrated ATF field agents were ordered to “stand down.” There was no interest in prosecuting the straw buyers on charges of “lying and buying.” Those who put the Fast and Furious operation together had bigger targets in mind.
Eventually, hundreds of weapons found their way to drug smugglers and other violent gangs throughout Mexico, some traveling 1,800 miles south to Acapulco with others turning up 1,200 miles east in Reynosa, near the Gulf of Mexico. Some Fast and Furious weapons also were discovered 1,300 miles southwest in La Paz, on the tip of Baja California.

The strategy had neither a stop sign nor a cutoff switch — until Dec. 14, 2010, when the investigation came to an abrupt halt. What had been feared by field agents had happened: At least two Fast and Furious AK-47s purchased at an Arizona gun shop turned up just north of the Arizona-Mexico border at the site of the killing of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian A. Terry.

The agent’s death during a firefight with Mexican bandits in a popular drug-smuggling corridor known as Peck Canyon confirmed the worst fears of at least one of the licensed Fast and Furious gun dealers. The dealer had sought assurances from the ATF on two occasions that weapons he was selling would never end up in the hands of the “bad guys.”

In an email, the dealer told the ATF he understood the investigation was ongoing so information about it would be limited, but since the border was awash in both guns and violence, he was reaching out for assurances that “none of the firearms” he was selling at the Lone Wolf Trading Co. in Glendale, Ariz., “could or would ever end up south of the border.”

The dealer told the ATF he wanted to help the agency with its investigation, “but not at the risk of agents’ safety, because I have some very close friends that are U.S. Border Patrol agents in southern Arizona.”

ATF assurances
The dealer’s email prompted the following response from ATF Group VII Strike Force Supervisor David J. Voth, who oversaw the Fast and Furious operation: “I understand that the frequency with which some individuals under investigation by our office have been purchasing firearms from your business has caused concerns for you.

“However, if it helps put you at ease, we are continually monitoring these suspects using a variety of investigative techniques, which I cannot go into [in] detail,” Mr. Voth wrote.

Later, ATF arranged a meeting between the dealer and Assistant U.S. Attorney Emory Hurley, the lead prosecutor in Fast and Furious, during which the dealer was again assured that safeguards were in place to prevent further distribution of the weapons.

The dealer had sought assurances after selling more than 300 weapons to straw buyers he knew were Fast and Furious targets. After being told by ATF and the U.S. Attorney's Office that the gun buyers and weapons were being continually monitored, he went on to sell an additional 450 guns.

Less than six months later, the ATF confirmed that two WASR-10/63 assault rifles found at the site of the Terry killing had been traced to Jaime Avila Jr., a suspected straw buyer and one of the Fast and Furious targets.

He had bought the weapons, a Romanian variant of the AK-47, at the Lone Wolf Trading Co.
By the time of the shooting, Mr. Avila had been under surveillance for more than two months. It took ATF less than 24 hours to confirm that he had purchased the weapons found at the site of the Terry killing.
The operation was shut down, and Mr. Avila was arrested, along with 19 others named in a federal grand jury indictment on charges of dealing in firearms without a license, making false statements in connection with the acquisition of a weapon, and smuggling goods from the United States.
Trials for the 20 straw-purchase suspects are pending.

Big purchases
Those identified as the straw buyers in Fast and Furious were nothing if they weren’t ambitious. They bought hundreds of high-powered weapons and spent hundreds of thousands of dollars. Although many of the purchased weapons were not top of the line, they weren’t cheap.

According to government records, the straw buyers spent an average of $648 for each AK-47-type assault rifle they bought. The Barrett .50-caliber sniper rifles went for more than $6,000 each, and the FN 5.7mm pistols cost an average of $1,130 each.

Uriel Patino, a food-stamps recipient, proved to be the most prolific straw buyer, said the indictment, which alleges that he bought 316 weapons, although congressional investigators said the number might be twice as high. Included were 246 AK-47 assault rifles purchased during 24 visits to two Phoenix-area gun shops over a nine-month period.

Mr. Avila and Mr. Patino, the indictment said, shopped together at the Lone Wolf Trading Co.
According to the 43-page indictment handed up in January, Mr. Patino’s buying habits were aggressive.

On Nov. 24, 2009, he purchased five AK-47 assault rifles; on Dec. 11, 2009, he purchased 20 more; on Jan. 15, 2010, he bought 10 more; on Jan. 30, 2010, he purchased 15 more; on March 15, 2010, he purchased 40 more; on March 25, 2010, he bought an additional 26; on April 27, 2010, he bought 10 FN 5.7mm pistols; on June 10, 2010, he bought an additional 10 AK-47s; and on July 8, 2010, he bought 16 more AK-47s.

Mr. Patino came to the attention of ATF in October 2009. Within three weeks, he had purchased a total of 34 weapons, including the AK-47s from gun dealers cooperating in Fast and Furious. The serial numbers of the weapons were logged into the ATF’s Suspect Gun Database, which discovered that one of them had turned up in Mexico just 14 days after it had been bought.

ATF is supposed to stop criminals from trafficking guns to Mexican drug cartels,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, who began the Fast and Furious probe last year. “Instead, ATF made it easier for alleged cartel middlemen to get weapons from U.S. gun dealers.”

Kept in the dark
While Fast and Furious was supposed to monitor the purchased weapons as they headed to buyers in Mexico, ATF agents assigned in Mexico had been kept in the dark about the operation.

“I would like to apologize to my former Mexican law enforcement counterparts and to the Mexican people for Operation Fast and Furious,” Darren Gil, former ATF attache to Mexico, told the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. “I hope they understand that this was kept secret from most of ATF, including me and my colleagues in Mexico.”

During a rancorous five-hour hearing, ATF agents assigned in Mexico said they discovered the Fast and Furious investigation only after documenting that an alarming rate of guns found at violent crime sites in Mexico were being traced to Arizona gun dealers.

Mr. Gil said he found it “inconceivable” that any competent ATF agent would allow “firearms to disappear at all,” especially on an international border. As a result, he said, Mexico will continue to suffer the consequences of drug-related firearms violence.

Agent Carlos Canino, ATF’s acting attache to Mexico, angrily told the committee that “walking guns” was not a recognized investigative technique, adding that hundreds of weapons ultimately went to ruthless criminals in Mexico.

“It infuriates me that people, including my law enforcement, diplomatic and military colleagues, may be killed or injured with these weapons,” he said, adding that “never in my wildest dreams” would he have thought that ATF agents would allow guns to be walked to Mexican criminals.

Noting that Fast and Furious ended with the killing of a U.S. Border Patrol agent, one high-ranking former Border Patrol official described the operation as “scary.”

“The only thing I can figure is that the politicians in the upper management of the agencies involved decided it would work,” the official told The Washington Times on the condition of anonymity for fear of being reprimanded. “They sure as hell couldn’t have run it by the agents in the field who would have known what would happen.”

‘The most fun you have’
Not only were the ATF agents in Mexico unaware of the Fast and Furious investigation, several ATF agents involved in the operation itself had their own concerns.

Agent Olindo James Casa testified before the House committee that as a member of the Group VII Strike Force, he discovered that straw buyers were purchasing numerous firearms, that “no law enforcement activity” had been planned to stop them, and that numerous firearm traces had put many of the weapons in Mexico.

Because they were “increasingly concerned and alarmed,” he said, he and several other strike force agents took the matter to their bosses, including Mr. Voth, but to no avail. Instead, he said, they received an email they regarded as a “direct threat to the agents who were not in agreement” on how the operation should be run.

“Based on my 18 years of experience with the ATF, I did not think the email was an empty threat. I took it very seriously,” Mr. Casa said.

In that March 12, 2010, email, Mr. Voth told the agents that “close attention” was being paid to Fast and Furious by “people of rank and authority” at ATF headquarters in Washington.

“It may sound cheesy, but we are ‘The tip of the ATF spear’ when it comes to Southwest border firearms trafficking. I will be damned if this case is going to suffer due to petty arguing, rumors or other adolescent behavior,” Mr. Voth wrote. “If you don’t think this is fun, you’re in the wrong line of work — period!
“This is the pinnacle of domestic U.S. law enforcement techniques. After this, the toolbox is empty,” he wrote.

“Maybe the Maricopa County Jail is hiring detention officers, and you get paid $30,000 (instead of $100,000) to serve lunch to inmates all day. We need to get over this bump in the road once and for all and get on with the mission at hand. This can be the most fun you have with ATF, the only one limiting the amount of fun we have is you!”

Mr. Voth summed up the Fast and Furious program in an April 2010 memo, saying the violence in Mexico “is severe and without being dramatic, we have a sense of urgency with regards” to Fast and Furious. He noted that the straw buyers had purchased 359 firearms during the month of March 2010 alone, including numerous Barrett .50-caliber rifles.

“I believe we are righteous in our plan to dismantle this entire organization, and to rush in to arrest any one person without taking into account the entire scope of the conspiracy would be ill-advised to the overall good of the mission,” he said.

The repercussions
William McMahon, ATF deputy assistant director for field operations in Phoenix and Mexico, and William Newell, former ATF special agent in charge of the Phoenix field division, also defended the operation in their committee testimony.

Mr. Newell testified that ATF had good intentions when it began the operation in 2009 and that it was not its purpose to permit the transfer of firearms to Mexico. He said he would do such an investigation again with some changes.

In a supplemental statement to the committee, Mr. Newell said that after reviewing his testimony, he concluded he “should have conducted more frequent assessments” of the operation during which he could have “articulated to my staff the need to be proactive in ascertaining the quantity of guns being purchased that we were not able to intercept.”

Mr. Voth, Mr. Newell and Mr. McMahon all have since been moved to administrative duties.

Knowledge on high
President Obama has said he did not authorize Fast and Furious, and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. told the House Judiciary Committee in May that he first became aware of it in April. “I probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks,” he said.

But Mr. Grassley and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell E. Issa, California Republican, said Mr. Holder received at least five weekly memos beginning in July 2010 describing the Fast and Furious investigation.

The July 2010 memo from Michael Walther, director of the National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC), specifically identifies the Fast and Furious operation, says when it began, names the law enforcement agencies involved, and identifies the major investigative targets.

Sent to Mr. Holder through the office of the acting deputy attorney general, the memo also noted that the operation involved a Phoenix-based firearms-trafficking ring and said “straw purchasers” were responsible for buying 1,500 firearms “that were then supplied to Mexican drug-trafficking cartels.”

The Walther memo also said the straw buyers had direct ties to the Sinaloa drug cartel, “which was suspected of providing $1 million for the purchase of firearms in the Greater Phoenix area.”

“Attorney General Holder has failed to give Congress and the American people an honest account of what he and other senior Justice Department officials knew about gunwalking and Operation Fast and Furious,” Mr. Issa said. “The lack of candor and honesty from our nation’s chief law enforcement officials in this matter is deeply disturbing.

“Tragically, it wasn’t until Fast and Furious guns were found at the murder scene of a Border Patrol agent that Justice officials finally ended this reckless and arrogant effort,” he said.

Mr. Holder, in a letter last week, denied that emails sent to his office showed he knew of Fast and Furious before April.

He said public comments about the inquiry and his involvement with it had become “so base and so harmful to interests that I hope we all share,” he had to publicly address the matter.

He said he took “decisive action” when he learned about the program in ordering the Office of Inspector General to investigate the matter. He said he also overhauled the leadership at ATF and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Phoenix.

Last week, Mr. Issa issued a subpoena for Justice Department officials, including Mr. Holder and more than a dozen of his top deputies. He said the department’s top echelon of officials “know more about Operation Fast and Furious than they have publicly acknowledged.”

© Copyright 2011 The Washington Times, LLC.

Darrell Issa’s Fast and Furious rebuke of Eric Holder is one for the ages


By Doug Book, staff writer

Upon being proven to have perjured himself before the House Government Affairs Committee,  Attorney General Eric Holder did what any dedicated leftist would;  he changed the subject and blamed someone else.

In a childish and petulant letter to his principle adversary,  Darrell Issa,  Holder accused the Republican congressman of cynical efforts to  “score political points”  and repeated his claim to have known nothing of Operation Fast and Furious in 2010.

But Issa would have none of the Attorney General’s bogus claims or pathetic excuses.  In a masterpiece of typewritten homicide which has received far too little attention from conservative bloggers–and of course NONE from the mainstream media–Issa exposed  Holder’s  criminal activities and his lies and misrepresentations concerning Department of Justice involvement in Operation Fast and Furious.

With no trace of the professional courtesy or benefit of the doubt so often accorded one longtime inhabitant of D.C. by another,  Issa pointedly accused Holder of deliberately  “…undermining the  [Fast and Furious]  investigation”  by offering a  “roving set of ever-changing explanations to justify its  (DOJ)  involvement.”  

And Issa rightly stated that,  in shifting blame for the Operation’s  “shortcomings”  from the Bureau of Alcohol,  Tobacco and Firearms  (ATF)  to the Phoenix US Attorney’s Office,  Holder’s  “efforts were designed to circle the wagons around DOJ and its political appointees.” 

Of Holder’s letter itself,  the congressman made it clear the Attorney General had done little but  “obfuscate,  shift blame,  berate and attempt to change the topic from the  [DOJ's]  responsibility in the creation,  implementation and authorization of this reckless program  (Fast and Furious.)

Of course that was obviously Holder’s intent.  But rarely has a D.C. Republican had the courage to make such an unequivocal charge and call out a radical leftist for his blatant dishonesty and contempt for the American public.

Of Holder’s oft repeated promise to  “destroy the cartels”,  Issa wrote  “Fast and Furious simply served as a convenient means for dangerous cartels to acquire upwards of 2,000 assault style weapons.”

It has long been known that the Obama Regime made a deal with the Sineloa drug cartel,  offering this gang of murderous drug dealers free reign to operate throughout the United States in return for assistance in the breaking of other Mexican drug gangs.

And Issa had the fortitude to put this fact before the American people by accusing the Attorney General of direct complicity in the deaths of hundreds of innocent people in Mexico and the US.
In keeping with his fearless tone,  Congressman Issa concluded with this most damning appraisal of the Attorney General and his Department of Justice:

  “Operation Fast and Furious was the Department’s most significant gun trafficking case.  It related to two of your major initiatives–destroying the Mexican cartels and reducing gun violence on both sides of the border. On your watch,  it went spectacularly wrong.  Whether you realize yet or not,  you own Fast and Furious.  It is your responsibility”  

Darrell Issa deserves our thanks and admiration for his gutsy and straightforward disclosure of Eric Holder activities. Voters must elect more Republican politicians willing to display such courage.


Kevin Collins 

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Statement From ATF Special Agent Vincent A. Cefalu On ATF Upper Management Involved In Fast N Furious

VINCENT A CEFALU

Special Agent 

Bureau Of Alcohol Tobacco And Firearms




Since this matter has resurfaced in an attempt by the ATF Spin Doctor Scot Thomasson, its probably appropriate to address it.First Scot, the American people, Congress and more importantly our Agents, Inspectors and Clerical Staff are NOT stupid. Remember? We live here to and know EXACTLY what smoke and mirrors and word splitting you are capable of. If you think for one minute that people are enraged or or outraged about a minor misstatement by an uneducated media that these guys were promoted, once again you are dead wrong. They are mad they they (the taxpayers) had to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to relocate these guys out of the public eye to protect their SES and management positions even before the OIG report has been submitted. Now all this money has been paid, and what happens when a competent authority prosecutes and convicts them for one of the many laws they've broken? Are they going to pay that money back? Of course not. Now lets break down your statements for the public who does not necessarily understand the nuances of ATFs corrupt smoke and mirrors. FELL FREE to respond. You are welcomed and invited to do so.

"Yesterday news reports suggested that ATF agents involved in supervising Operation Fast and Furious had been promoted and reassigned. A statement from Scot Thomasson, chief, Public Affairs Division, Office of Public and Governmental Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) now suggests that the agents were reassigned to administrative duties but not promoted. So what? Does that somehow suggest accountability by placing them in positions still overseeing critical ATF programs or alleviate their crimes, broken policy's and violations of their oath of office? NO!!!!! See the following:

“Recent media reports have inaccurately characterized personnel changes involving ATF agents associated with the Fast and Furious operation as promotions. So what? And FYI Ive made 3 PCS(permanent change of station)moves and you can make a ton of money on a PCS move. Therefore there IS financial Gain. Special Agents Voth, Newell and McMahon were laterally transferred from operational positions and moved into administrative roles, they were not promoted. Voth now oversees not just a small group but our ENTIRE Tobacco diversion programs and hes NOT in HQ he's being allowed to do it from Phoenix. His decisions now effect Hundreds of investigations, not dozens, AND he gets his HQ credit for further promotions. They did not receive salary or grade increases nor did they assume positions with greater responsibility. NOR have they been benched or taken out of ATF operations in the manner EVERY OTHER AGENT facing an OIG investigation such as this WOULD HAVE BEEN. Newell has his feet kicked up, still drawing exactly the same pay, same rank as he has all along. BUT hes doing it on per Diem. Which for a guy who publicly turned down a previous attempt to bring him to HQ crying that he was upside down on his house, is quite a financial perk. McMahon? When did the Deputy Assistant Director of our Internal Affairs become non operational or administrative. He oversees EVERY integrity and many misconduct cases against field agents. His position may be the most bizarre of all. He is now the DIRECT point of contact for the OIG who is investigating HIS actions. Just sayin people, if it looks corrupt, smells corrupt it probably is. Begs to question any judgement or commitment by the Agency to correct or address this debacle. (In the interest of transparency, the personal abuses I have suffered, Have gone right across Bill McMahons desk. I not only reported his actions and integrity violations and exposed an inaccurate and totally incomplete IA investigation, but he then sat on The PANEL who then voted to terminate me. Go Figure. That IA investigation or lack there of will be made public shortly, and the readers will see that not ONE out of a possible 10-12 Special agents and Police officers who did testify or are prepared to testify under oath that Gleysteen Downs, Vido and others fabricated AND subsequently perjured themselves in their quest to retaliate against me for telling the truth. Why is this relevant? Mc Mahon is now the guy who will be required to REVIEW said deficient Internal affairs report. If this wasn't so damn serious, it would be funny as hell)

On May 13, 2011, Deputy Assistant Director McMahon, Field Operations was reassigned to a position within the Office of Professional Responsibility and Security Operations back filling a position that had been vacant for over a year. His transfer was one of six other transfers announced on that day involving various other positions.See ABOVE

On August 1, 2011, Special Agent Newell, who had been selected as Country Attaché Mexico City, was reassigned to the Office of Management to assist with the OIG investigation and Congressional inquiry. He drew out of country benefits for as long as he could until Hoover and Chait realized they would be tarred and feathered if they sent Newell to Mexico. Should he even be involved in any query other than as a suspect. No other agent I am aware of in 25 years has been allowed to assist in the investigation of their own violations. Must be a new policy. AT SES pay and benefits. There are agents who have sat home for years, yes YEARS while they we being investigated.

Furthermore, Special Agent Voth was reassigned to a headquarters position, a lateral move into a program area. These transfers/reassignments have never been described as promotions in any of the documents announcing them”. Described? Oh so I guess it aint so because you didn't describe them. Again, Voth has MORE authority, he in not placed on admin leave and he isn't even being transferred to HQ in any timely manner. Hell the "breaking a few eggs" comment should have gotten him removed from management period. Voth, this one is straight from me to you. THEY AREN'T EGGS, THEY ARE HUMAN LIVES, MEXICAN CITIZENS AND TWO U.S. FEDERAL AGENTS.


CLEANUP ATF.ORG

The House Judiciary Committee And Their 2012 Views And Estimates.










About the Judiciary Committee

The jurisdiction of the The House Committee on the Judiciary as follows:
  1. The judiciary and judicial proceedings, civil and criminal.
  2. Administrative practice and procedure.
  3. Apportionment of Representatives.
  4. Bankruptcy, mutiny, espionage, and counterfeiting.
  5. Civil liberties.
  6. Constitutional amendments.
  7. Criminal law enforcement.
  8. Federal courts and judges, and local courts in the Territories and possessions.
  9. Immigration policy and non-border enforcement.
  10. Interstate compacts generally.
  11. Claims against the United States.
  12. Members of Congress, attendance of members, Delegates, and the Resident Commissioner; and their acceptance of incompatible offices.
  13. National penitentiaries.
  14. Patents, the Patent and Trademark Office, copyrights, and trademarks.
  15. Presidential succession.
  16. Protection of trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies.
  17. Revision and codification of the Statutes of the United States.
  18. State and territorial boundary lines.
  19. Subversive activities affecting the internal security of the United States. 
     
     Click the link below
     2012 VIEWS AND ESTIMATES OF THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

Hearings for the 112th Congress House Judiciary Commitee For November 2011






Hearing Information
Hearing on: "21st Century Law Enforcement: How Smart Policing Targets Criminal Behavior"
Friday 11/4/2011 - 10:00 a.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
By Direction of the Chairman


Hearing on: H.R. 2121, the "China Democracy Promotion Act of 2011"
Wednesday 11/2/2011 - 1:30 p.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement
By Direction of the Chairman


Oversight Hearing on: The U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs
Wednesday 11/2/2011 - 10:00 a.m.

2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security
By Direction of the Chairman


House Judiciary Committee

Republicans Grill Napolitano on Fast and Furious

Audrey Hudson
by  Audrey Hudson
 
 
 
 
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano faced a determined panel of House Republicans on Wednesday who grilled her on immigration policies, border security, and how her agency responded after the death of a federal officer exposed the “Fast and Furious” controversy.

Her answers were brief and not very forthcoming, as she sidestepped some questions and invoked the ongoing inspector’s general investigation as her mantra to avoid many questions altogether.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R.-Calif.), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, is leading the investigation into the government’s failed operation to track 1,000 guns pouring into the hands of a Mexican drug cartel.  He sat in on the Judiciary Committee’s oversight hearing to ask questions about his investigation, but quickly became exasperated with Napolitano’s answers after inquiring what her agency did for three months after Border Patrol Officer Brian Terry was shot, and prior to the beginning of the investigation.

“You have two dead agents who worked for you.  It has been months, and you’re telling me you weren’t doing anything because of an inspector general investigation?” Issa pressed.

“Now wait just a minute!” Napolitano responded, objecting to Issa’s “insinuation.”

“Aren’t you outraged?” Issa said.  “Aren’t you furious?”

Napolitano initially said she would respond to Issa’s questions in writing, but after several more questions about the operation, she answered:  “I think we all should be outraged at the death of agent Terry, and the first thing to recognize is who actually killed him.”

After Terry’s death, Napolitano said she met with the FBI and was briefed on their investigation into who committed the murder, but said she was never informed that the crime was committed with two guns acquired through Fast and Furious.

“That was my No. 1 concern, that those responsible for the shooting death were brought to justice, and that is what I was being kept apprised of,” Napolitano said.

Napolitano said she never had a conversation with Holder or anyone else about the operation while it was ongoing, and has still not discussed the matter with Holder.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R.-Va.) asked how often the Homeland Security secretary met with the attorney general to discuss security issues or ongoing investigations.
“Not that frequently,” Napolitano said.

Goodlatte suggested they should meet frequently, and that better communication might have produced the revelation that “Whoa!  This is a crazy idea to give guns to drug smugglers,” and prevent future questionable operations from ending in tragedy.

Throughout the hearing, Republicans grilled Napolitano on the Obama administration’s immigration policies, including amnesty through prosecutorial discretion, how they are enforcing Alabama’s new law, and border and worksite enforcement.

Democrats focused their questioning on concerns that detainees were transferred too many times, and too far away from family or legal counsel, and how officials were dealing with complaints of sexual assault and harassment.

On Alabama’s new law that allows schools to check legal status and police to hold illegal immigrant suspects, Napolitano said the only support Homeland Security has provided is in helping the Justice Department challenge the law.

Questioning Napolitano about the Government Accountability Office report that only 44% of the Southwest border is under the “operational control” of the Border Patrol, Rep. Ted Poe (R.-Tex.) wanted to know who controls the other 56%?

Napolitano said the term “operational control” was a “term of art” that was “somewhat misleading,” but didn’t answer the question.

“It’s a very different border than it was three years ago,” Napolitano said.

“I agree, it’s worse,” Poe responded.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R. –Texas), chairman of the committee, later clarified that “only 15% of the border is under actual control.”

Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner wanted to know how much longer the department would delay the REAL ID program, which requires states to comply with certain federal guidelines for identification cards and driver's licenses.  He later expressed disappointment that she “evaded my question four times.”

Napolitano’s evasiveness on many answers frustrated several lawmakers during the three-hour hearing.

“I’m amazed at some of the answers you’ve given, knowing that you were coming before this committee,” said Rep. Sandy Adams (R.-Fla.).


Audrey Hudson, an award-winning investigative journalist, is a Congressional Correspondent for HUMAN EVENTS. A native of Kentucky, Mrs. Hudson has worked inside the Beltway for nearly two decades -- on Capitol Hill as a Senate and House spokeswoman, and most recently at The Washington Times covering Congress, Homeland Security, and the Supreme Court.  Follow Audrey on  Twitter and Facebook

TSA struggles through its love-hate relationship with social media

By Keith Laing 
 
Websites like Twitter, Facebook and YouTube are unlikely to get a friend request from the Transportation Security Administration any time soon.
Like most other government agencies, TSA has an active presence online and in social media, with a website, blog and pages on YouTube and Twitter.


But, while other agencies primarily use those tools to get a message out, the TSA frequently finds itself battling firestorms sparked when any of the nearly 1.8 million airline passengers it checks for flights each day sends out a message from their cell phone or computer complaining about a screening, pat-down or bag search.
 
Just this week, TSA battled negative headlines after a woman posted a picture on Twitter of a note a TSA inspector had left behind after searching her bag and finding a sex toy. “Get your freak on, girl,” the inspector wrote.

The story went viral, and TSA apologized. Then, through its own “Blogger Bob” Burns, TSA told the public the worker responsible for the note had been removed from checking bags at Newark’s Liberty International Airport.

The ‘freak on’ case was not the first time a story involving TSA became national news after a post on social media by an irritated passenger.

Earlier this year, video was posted on YouTube of an older woman being patted down at the Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Ariz. The woman claimed in the video that she was sexually assault by the TSA officers who searched her by hand.

In another case, a passenger standing in the security line at the Kansas City International Airport posted a photo on Twitter of an 8-month-old baby receiving one of the controversial TSA pat downs.
TSA has made headlines with its Internet presence, too, and has sought to highlight its efforts to protect passenger safety.

“Blogger Bob” posts a week-in-review column that spotlight items found at airport security checkpoints. A recent such post revealed that in one weekend, TSA found guns, throwing knives and inert grenades carried in passengers’ bags.

TSA tweets the “Blogger Bob” reports and also uses YouTube to highlight its efforts.

Posts like that show TSA has done a good job trying to use social media to its advantage, said social media observer Anil Dash. But like most government agencies, TSA is more limited than a private business would be in what it can do.

“TSA was early to blogging and social media in general, and does a great job of communicating clearly in a human voice, with a well-defined policy on things like comments,” Dash, a New York-based blogger who writes frequently about social media, said in an email to The Hill.

The problem for TSA, Dash said, is that they are mostly reacting.

“Their social media staff clearly aren't empowered to actually impact policy at the agency, and that leaves them either having their hands tied in trying to change things, or stuck being the public face for ridiculous policies,” he said. “In the ideal case, social media communicators on the front lines of engagement with the public can work as a type of ombudsman, influencing the decisions that policy makers put into place, based on their direct knowledge of what the public wants.”

TSA sees social media as an effective tool to fight back at “myths” about it, a spokesman said.
“The blog has been a great tool for TSA to explain the whys of security to the traveling public,” TSA spokesman Kawika Riley said in a statement provided to The Hill. “It’s also an excellent way for TSA to share information about what we do and debunk myths.”

TSA’s blog, and its blogger Bob, have won multiple awards, including the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association’s (AFCEA) “Government Wide Initiatives Excellence Award  for Social Media” in 2010.

TSA critics like Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), however, see the other side of the social media equation: The quick distribution of troublesome incidents keeps the often-criticized agency on its toes.

“Social networking is a positive for the American people because it lets government officials know that they are not acting in a vacuum and their actions are going to come back to haunt them if they’re not behaving appropriately,” Rachel Mills, a spokeswoman for Paul, said in an interview.

Paul, who is also a candidate for the Republican nomination for president next year, has called for abolishing the TSA.

Dash said while TSA may win awards for its presence, it will remain difficult for the agency win minds on social media.

“I hope the TSA heads that way, but understand that their being part of the general Homeland Security infrastructure might present something of an obstacle to it,” he said.


The Hill

Accountability needed

To the Editor:

You can check previous administrations up to the present, and look at the history of accountability with politicians and government agencies, but there is none.

What you will hear is “resignation.” No criminal charges. In the private sector, there would be fines and jail time for some of these offenses, but in Washington, they are above the law.

From the Gulf oil spill, with the head of a government agency charged with inspecting these rigs allegedly taking bribes, to the “Fast and Furious” scandal with Eric Holder’s lack of recollection, and everything from the past to the present, no accountability.

Is resignation a way to end an issue? To stop an investigation to see how far it goes? We can only speculate.
It is time for Americans to wake up and demand Washington to be accountable for its actions and send a message. They are not above the law. They must atone for their crimes against the people and laws of our land. Resignation is not an option.

James M. Korjenek
Wonder Lake

Border agent Jesus Diaz persecution, US Justice Department corruption, Obama motive Hispanic vote, Citizen Wells opinion

Border agent Jesus Diaz persecution, US Justice Department corruption, Obama motive Hispanic vote, Citizen Wells opinion
Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and other innocent people were killed as a result of project “Fast and Furious.” Eric Holder is under investigation. The likely purpose of the project was to appeal to the far left, Obama’s core support, by creating the need for more gun control.

The disregard for border agents and securing our borders is due to the fact that Obama wants the Hispanic vote. It comes as no surprise that the Justice Department, at the urging of the Mexican Government, has chosen to persecute Border agent Jesus Diaz.

I have read the evidence that is available, I have listened to an interview of his wife and this is my conclusion:
Based on the available evidence, Border Patrol Agent Jesus Diaz should have at the most been given a reprimand and clarification of department policy.

My personal opinion is that it would be ok to shoot the illegal, criminal violator of our sovereignty and multiple statutes in the leg. The young man invaded our country and agent Diaz was protecting us. I believe that he deserves a medal.

The Mexican Government and our government are treading on very thin ice.

Thomas Jefferson comes to mind.

Citizen Wells

At least 200 Mexicans have been killed by weapons related to ATF operation “Fast and Furious”

The chairman of the Oversight Committee of the House of Representatives, Darrell Issa reported that 200 Mexicans deaths were because the ATF purposely let weapons enter Mexico.

“We are talking about  people killed on both sides of the border. An estimated 200 Mexicans were killed by weapons that our government , our government, allowed to pass, “Issa said in an interview with CNN.

Issa, whose committee currently investigates the operation and involvement of federal officials, criticized the lack of full readiness to cooperate even though two of the weapons were also used to kill Border Patrol agent, Brian Terry.

The investigation of Issa, California Republican lawmaker, has been criticized by the highest-ranking Democrat of the Committee, Elijah Cummings, who has suggested publicly that the investigation of “Fast and Furious” has political purposes.

Just this month, the Committee issued a subpoena to the attorney general, Eric Holder, and senior officials of the Justice Department to release documents about his role and knowledge of “Fast and Furious”.

The ATF announced last week that it will hold a general restructuring of the agency and a review of its tactics as a result of the operation that led to the illegal entry of more than two thousand weapons to Mexico.


Source Mexico

Friday, October 28, 2011

ICE blamed for Texas parolee law delay

The state has been unable to enforce a new law designed to increase the deportations of illegal immigrants from the Texas prison system amid concerns that federal immigration officials are unprepared to handle the anticipated influx of convicted criminals, state officials said.

Under the new law, which was scheduled to take effect Sept. 1, state prisoners who are granted parole and turned over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials must either be deported or leave the country voluntarily - or risk being returned to state custody to serve out the remainder of their sentences.

The law was crafted to address a vexing problem identified by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, which reported granting parole to some illegal immigrants and turning them over to ICE - only to later learn that they were not removed from the country, said state Rep. Jerry Madden, R-Plano.

Madden, chairman of the House Corrections Committee, said the law also aims to save taxpayers millions of dollars by paroling primarily "low-risk, nonviolent" prisoners who are in the country illegally after they become eligible for parole.

ICE officials indicated this week that they need to hire a "few" more agents to process the expected increase in deportable prisoners coming out of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, but they have not indicated how many, Madden said.

He added that the state does not yet have a timeline for implementing the law.

"Before we implement it, we need to make sure ICE will be able to handle the load we would possibly be sending them," Madden said.

'Treading water'

ICE spokesman Gregory Palmore said the agency will work with the state and provide additional manpower and bed space if needed.

He said ICE has already absorbed a sharp uptick in the number of prisoners released from TDCJ custody - up about 28 percent since Oct. 1, the start of the fiscal year, compared with the same time period last year.

But ICE union officials in Texas warned that their operation in Huntsville, which processes state prisoners for deportation, is "treading water."

"If the state of Texas doubles or triples their releases on a given day, there is no way we will be able to keep up," said Tre Rebstock, president of the local ICE union.

Federal officials estimate that roughly 11,500 of TDCJ's 156,000 prisoners are illegal immigrants. Madden said roughly 6,000 of them are eligible for parole.

Each month, TDCJ releases to ICE about 400 suspected illegal immigrants who have served their full sentences or have been granted parole - or roughly 5,000 annually, according to ICE data.

Shortage of judges

ICE has identified and filed paperwork to detain more than 10,000 suspected illegal immigrants currently incarcerated in Texas.

But state officials said many of the illegal immigrants identified by ICE still have pending immigration cases when they are up for parole, which often means they are entitled to appear before an immigration judge before they can be removed from the U.S.

ICE union officials said part of the problem lies in a shortage of immigration judges assigned to hear cases in Huntsville. The immigration court system is run by a separate agency, the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which declined comment on Thursday.

Rissie Owens, chair of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, said that unless ICE has finished its removal proceedings, board members can't be sure that "those they vote to release are actually deported and not released into our communities where they may be a threat to pubic safety."

ICE data shows that roughly one in five of the 5,000 illegal immigrants discharged annually lacks a final removal order clearing the way for deportation.

Some offenders held

ICE is required by federal law to detain suspected illegal immigrants with convictions for many serious crimes - such as murder and sexual assault - until they are removed from the country, with certain limited exceptions.
In the past, the agency has released some suspected illegal immigrants with criminal records, primarily for nonviolent crimes, under orders of supervision while they await hearings in Houston's immigration court, which now has backlogs stretching into 2013.

Under the new state law, ICE can no longer release detainees with criminal convictions, and instead must either remove them from the country, house them in its own federal detention system or return them to the custody of TDCJ.

Months of meetings

The parole board has been meeting with ICE officials for months to work out how to enforce the new law.
"We wanted to make sure people turned over to ICE were going to be deported," Madden said. "We are trying to make sure the public is safe, and at the same time try to save us some hard-earned resources and some money that the state would not have to be spending."

Some victims advocates said the state needs to be careful in how the law is enacted, questioning whether it is fair to consider shaving off time for foreign-born inmates who have been convicted of serious crimes.

"If you are going to take murderers that are sentenced to long periods of time and just deport them rather than have them serve their sentences, I don't really think that's fair," said William "Rusty" Hubbarth, an attorney with the Houston-based organization Justice for All, a crime victims group. "They should be made to serve their sentences."

susan.carroll@chron.com

Attorney General Holder to face lawmakers on gun sting


Attorney General Eric Holder gestures at an annual awards ceremony for the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency in Washington October 18, 2011. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
WASHINGTON | Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:27pm EDT
(Reuters) - Attorney General Eric Holder will testify in December to a congressional panel about a botched operation to track guns smuggled from the United States to Mexican drug cartels, officials said on Friday.

Holder has agreed go before the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee on December 8 which could lead to a fierce volley of accusations by congressional Republicans who have harshly questioned what the attorney general knew and when.

The debacle stemmed from an attempt to crack down on guns being smuggled to the violent drug cartels in Mexico, but agents failed to track the guns after their initial purchase.

Some have since been found at crime scenes on both sides of the border and complicated ties between the two countries.

Two weapons from the operation, dubbed "Fast and Furious", were discovered at the scene of a shootout in which a U.S. Border Patrol agent was killed.

It is not known whether those guns fired the fatal bullets, but that incident led to some agents from the Justice Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to blow the whistle on the operation.

The attorney general has said he was unaware of the operation or its tactical details until after the scandal erupted earlier this year. The bungled operation has become a headache for the Obama administration.
Holder's planned congressional testimony was confirmed by spokeswomen for Holder and the committee.

The chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Republican Representative Darrell Issa, has repeatedly called on Holder to testify, seeking to sort out when he became aware of the operation and details on who approved it.

Issa, also a Judiciary Committee member, has been leading an inquiry by his own committee into the affair. He has accused Holder and other Justice Department officials of knowing earlier about the operation and its tactics, pointing to memos addressed to them that broadly referred to it.

No evidence has emerged that they knew specifically of the operation or its tactics before this year. The Justice Department's inspector general is also looking into it.

The scandal led to the resignation in August of the chief federal prosecutor in Arizona, Dennis Burke, whose office was running the operation in conjunction with the ATF.

The acting director of the ATF at the time, Kenneth Melson, also was removed from his job.

(Reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky in Washington, editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Doina Chiacu)


Rueters U.S. Edition 

Napolitano silent on alternatives while criminal aliens released in US

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told a House committee that she is “not aware” of any actions the Obama administration has taken against countries that will not accept back illegal immigrants in “deportation status,” some of whom have committed crimes. After a “six-month detention period,” the illegal immigrants are released within the United States.





“So you’re telling me you have not done any?” asked Adams.

“Not that I am aware of,” said Napolitano.

Under further questioning from Adams, Napolitano said she will “look into” the matter.

“You said just a minute ago you had not. Now, you want to look into it. I’ve listened to that all morning long. I’ve been amazed at some of the answers given, knowing that you were coming before this committee,” said Adams.

The exact language of section 243(d) reads as follows, “Discontinuing Granting Visas to Nationals of Country Denying or Delaying Accepting Alien — On being notified by the Attorney General that the government of a foreign country denies or unreasonably delays accepting an alien who is a citizen, subject, national, or resident of that country after the Attorney General asks whether the government will accept the alien under this section, the Secretary of State shall order consular officers in that foreign country to discontinue granting immigrant visas or nonimmigrant visas, or both, to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents of that country until the Attorney General notifies the Secretary that the country has accepted the alien.”



The Daily Caller

House panel to vote on White House subpoena for Solyndra docs










By Andrew Restuccia 
The Hill
 
 
A House Energy and Commerce Committee panel will vote next week on whether to subpoena the White House for documents on the Solyndra case.


Republicans scheduled a meeting of the committee’s investigative panel for Nov. 3 to vote on a resolution to authorize a White House subpoena. The meeting comes after the White House rejected Republicans’ request for all internal communications related to Solyndra.

“Subpoenaing the White House is a serious step that, unfortunately, appears necessary in light of the Obama administration’s stonewall on Solyndra,” Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), who chairs the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, said in a statement. “What is the White House trying to hide from the American public?”

If Republicans approve the resolution next week, it would mark the second time that the committee has subpoenaed the Obama administration for Solyndra documents.

The subcommittee voted in July to subpoena the White House Office of Management and Budget for documents related to the 2009 Energy Department loan guarantee to the company.

The July subpoena was issued before Solyndra filed for bankruptcy in early September and laid off 1,100 workers.

Earlier this month, White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler rejected Republicans’ request for all White House internal emails and documents related to the Solyndra loan.

Ruemmler noted that the White House Office of Management and Budget, the Treasury Department and the Energy Department have provided more than 70,000 pages of documents in recent months to Republicans. She also said that 900 pages of communications between the White House and Solyndra (and its investors and representatives) have been released in response to the GOP-led probe.

The documents that have been provided by the administration “should satisfy the committee’s stated objective,” Ruemmler said in a letter to the committee.

“Your most recent request for internal White House communications from the first day of the current administration to the present implicates longstanding and institutional executive-branch confidentiality interests,” the letter says.

But top Republicans on the committee doubled down on their request for the documents last week.

“The fact that other agencies are in the process of attempting to comply with our request for documents does not excuse the White House from producing its own responsive documents,” the letter from committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) and Stearns said in an Oct. 18 letter.

“Our request to the White House is not duplicative of our requests to other executive-branch agencies.”

Ruemmler again rejected Republicans’ request for the White House documents in an Oct. 25 letter.
Stearns noted Friday that the White House has not yet asserted executive privilege, which would bar lawmakers from obtaining the documents.

"While we of course respect Executive Privilege, the White House Counsel – in two separate letters to the Committee – has not asserted it," Stearns said. "Moreover, we fail to see why internal White House communications about a loan guarantee to a solar panel manufacturer would implicate issues of national security or the other foundations upon which the Supreme Court has recognized the Privilege."

Republicans have alleged that politics played a role in the approval of the loan guarantee and the decision to restructure the financing agreement in February.

The White House strongly denies those allegations.

The investigation has not uncovered evidence of political favoritism, but emails show that the White House pressed administration officials to make a swift decision on helping Solyndra. They also show that there was disagreement within the administration on the wisdom of approving the loan guarantee.


The Hill